Courts rule over the scope and interpretation of law. Courts cannot enact laws themselves. UKBA fees are part of immigration rules, which in turn are part of relevant immigration acts. Draft rules are presented in parliament and when passed, then and then only become rules and enforceable under the law. UKBA cannot just make the rules as they go along. So the UKBA fees is a parliamentary action and parliamentary action cannot be challenged in court of law.
The only way around it to lobby MPs and get an act passed from parliament to issue a refund. But then, MPs have better things to do than getting an act passed in parliament to issue you refund. By the way, this is just to put in perspective the importance of immigration rules, in case you were thinking that immigration rules are somehow similar to terms and conditions of argos, and you could somehow get your way after showing attitude.
Under the rules that I have explained, the application fees is for consideration of application and not for the grant of application. So, again, to get it across you understanding, as soon as an application is received by UKBA, the fees is due, no matter if its refused or is an invalid application.
Requirement to have ILR before citizenship is in accordance with British Nationality act 1981 (as amended). The only respite could be somehow getting the act of parliament amended. Try it if you want.
And sorry, you didn't make a mistake, it was total stupidity. Form AN asks in clear terms about ILR, how did you miss it. To be honest, I have come across many weird and strange immigration matters, but never have come across someone who somehow doesn't know that ILR is a requirement. Any bit you read about naturalisation, the requirement of ILR is loud and clear.
regards
Edited by user
13 years ago
|
Reason: Not specified