In my experience -- and this is just one person's experience, not case law! -- they use the name exactly as you fill it in at the beginning of the form, provided it clearly links to the name on your supporting documentation.
Originally, my surname was not hypenated (i.e., Ingle Gillis). Although my wife and I commonly used the hypen for many years, our legal documentation (passports, etc.) were without. I only added the hyphen legally by Statutory Declaration (i.e., Ingle-Gillis) to avoid the various kinds of confusion in the general world that you guys have already described.
At the moment, my US passport reads 'Ingle-Gillis', and my wife's reads 'Ingle Gillis' (without hypen). Her previous passport used her maiden name and had an amendment note elsewhere changing it to 'Ingle Gillis'.
The British IND authorities have always faithfully used the correct form, 'Ingle-Gillis', in any stamp she's had -- in both passports -- because that's the name under which she has applied. So we've never had to argue it with them; in fact, it's been far easier and more straightforward than I'd ever have expected.
But, the American Embassy authorities ... now *that's* a whole 'nother story ...
Edited by user
8 years ago
|
Reason: Not specified